A global context for Man-made Climate Concerns

Reblogged from https://edmhdotme.wordpress.com/

Earth has existed for some 4,600 million years.  This condensed history sets the current concerns about the level of atmospheric CO2 and the possible recent impact of extra Man-made CO2 affecting global temperature in a rational context.

CO2 in the atmosphere

To understand the context of current concerns about the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere from the Man-made activities, it is useful to review the long-term history of the Earth’s atmosphere.

  • as far as the development of life on Earth was concerned the first 4,000 million years were comparatively uneventful.  It took evolution all that time to make any advances beyond single cell/algal organisms. 
  • in those earlier times, ~3,300 million years ago CO2 had reached its maximum level of about 35%, 350,000 ppmv:  atmospheric CO2 concentration has progressively diminished ever since. 
  • it was only when photosynthesis took hold, that the level of atmospheric Oxygen could rise to its current level of ~22% of the atmosphere.
  • over the same period CO2 concentrations diminished as plant photosynthesis used the sun’s energy to convert atmospheric CO2 to sugars and thus to generate all other types of organic molecules associated with life.
  • CO2 has progressively disappeared from the atmosphere both being absorbed by the Oceans to be sequestered by Ocean life as limestones or later converted into fossil fuels from luxuriant Plant growth.
  • as a result atmospheric CO2 has reduced by some thousand fold from its high point of 35%, 350,000ppmv to arrive at the current levels around 400+ppmv.  

The Phanerozoic Eon:  the most recent 600 million years

Screenshot 2021-06-08 at 11.57.17.png

It is only in last 600 million years, the Phanerozoic Eon, (meaning, visible life), that Life on earth developed and changed radically:

  • throughout much of this period global temperatures were fairly stable.  In the main they were significantly higher at ~25°C more than 10°C higher than at present.
  • 600 million years ago all life only existed in the Oceans and atmospheric CO2 levels were high at 5000 – 7000 ppmv more than 12 – 15 times current levels.
  • about 500 million years ago Plants evolved to populate the land with CO2 levels still at 4000 – 5000 ppmv.
  • so, plant evolution took place with CO2 levels at more than 10 times higher than at present.
  • by 400 million years ago, Plant life on land had become very successful and productive worldwide at the a CO2 level, (~3000 – 4000ppmv).
  • that abundant Plant life was progressively laying down Coal formations and other fossil fuels.
  • this abundant period was followed by an extended ice age 320 – 280 million years ago when CO2 levels fell to close to current modern levels, (~500ppmv).
  • with higher temperatures again reaching to ~25°C CO2 levels advanced to a maximum of ~ 2500ppmv, ~170 million years ago.
  • this was the time of the dinosaurs lasting some 160 million years from 230 – 65 million years ago.
  • following the Global catastrophe, probably the Chixulub asteroid impact, when the dinosaurs became extinct 65 million years ago the World was gradually repopulated by mammals, who progressively filled the environmental niches vacated by the dinosaurs.
  • from a high CO2 level of ~2200ppmv some 160m years ago, CO2 concentration has declined consistently down to the current levels ranging from 180 – 410 ppmv.
  • likewise temperatures have also declined from about 25°C to about 15°C or lower.

The Quaternary Era

About 2,600,000 years ago the World again descended into a true Ice Age with permanent ice sheets at both poles.  The world is now living in that Ice Age.  There is no indication of how long Planet Eath may remain in its current state of glaciation.

Screenshot 2021-06-11 at 10.25.11.png

These long-term ice age conditions have generally maintained global temperatures as much as 8°C lower than in the present Interglacial.  These long-term Glaciations have resulted in massive Ice sheets covering much of the currently inhabited portion of the land mass of Northern Hemisphere.

During those 100,000 year long glacial periods CO2 levels have repeatedly fallen significantly.  This is a result of colder oceans being capable of re-absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere.  Once in the Oceans, CO2 can be lost permanently from the atmosphere, it is sequestered by marine life forming protective shells, which eventually sink and progressively form limestone rocks.  

Variations in the planetary orbital geometry within the Solar system have meant that this state of glaciation has been punctuated fairly regularly at roughly ~100,000 year intervals by interglacial periods, when temperatures have risen.

Interglacial warming has caused an enormous, positive but temporary change in the habitability of Planet Earth. 

These interglacial periods have been very productive for the biosphere and most recently for the development success of Man-kind.

As Oceans warm during Interglacials, they can no longer retain as much dissolved CO2 and as a result they slowly out-gas CO2.  Accordingly atmospheric CO2 increases following any temperature increase by about 800 years. 

Interglacial periods generally last 10,000 – 15,000 years.  The rate of temperature change from full glacial conditions to the benign environment of an interglacial can be sudden in geological terms, as seen here at the end of the Eemian interglacial and in the rapid temperature recovery at the beginning of our own benign Holocene.  Most Interglacial periods have been warmer than the present Holocene:  in the previous Eemian interglacial Hippopotami thrived in the Rhine delta some 120,000 years ago.

Screenshot 2021-06-24 at 07.04.58

Our Holocene epoch

Our current Holocene epoch is just the most recent of these warm interglacial intervals.  Our current warm Holocene interglacial has been beneficial to the Biosphere World wide.  The Holocene Epoch has been the enabler of mankind’s civilisation for the last 10,000 years. The congenial climate of the Holocene epoch spans from mankind’s earliest farming to the scientific and technological advances of the last 200 years.  The temperature profile of the Holocene interglacial has been remarkable when compared to the previous interglacial periods:  the temperatures have been lower and the profile apparently flattened and prolonged.

It is useful to look at climate change from a longer term, century by century and even on a millennial perspective when considering the scale of temperature changes that “Climate Alarmists” anticipate arising from Man-made Global Warming and their view of the disastrous effects of additional Man-made Carbon Dioxide emissions in the second part of the last century.  The differences shown by the Greenland Ice core records across the Holocene can be seen to be minor in comparison to the assertions of Climate Alarmists.

Screenshot 2021-06-24 at 07.13.46

From the record of past interglacials in the Quaternary era, our Holocene interglacial is now likely to be short lived on a geological timescale:  although as the Earth’s current orbit is less elliptical than in the past this Holocene interglacial may well be extended somewhat.

The Northern Hemisphere Ice Core records  from Greenland show:

  • for its first 7-8000 years the early Holocene, including its high point, known as “the Holocene Climate Optimum”, had virtually flat temperatures, an average drop of only ~0.007 °C per millennium.
  • but the more recent Holocene, since a “tipping point” at ~1000BC, has seen a temperature diminution at more than 20 times that earlier rate at about 0.14 °C per millennium.
  • each of the notable high points in the Holocene temperature record:
    • Holocene Climate Optimum
    • Minoan
    • Roman
    • Medieval
    • Modern.

have been progressively colder than the previous high point.

  • the last millennium 1000AD – 2000AD, encompassing the “Little Ice Age”, has been the coldest millennium of the entire Holocene interglacial.
  • the Holocene interglacial is already 10 – 11,000 years old and judging from the length of previous interglacial intervals the Holocene epoch should be drawing to its close: in this century, the next century or this millennium.
  • the beneficial recent warming, recovering from the Little Ice Age since the 1850s, occurred with two particular 20th century bursts to a Modern high.
  • only the latter of these 20th century temperature increases from ~1975 onwards till 2000 could have been influenced by any CO2 emissions from Man-kind’s fossil fuel use.
  • This temperature increase has has been “rebranded” as the:
    • “Great Man-made Global Warming Alarm”.
    • “Catastrophic Man-made Climate Change”.
    • “the Climate Emergency”
  • however Climate Alarmists seem to expect that because of the brief increase of temperature over the last quarter of the last century, that the warming recovery from the Little Ice Age will continue inexorably upwards.
  • meaning that in their view that there will be an immediate and exaggerated precipitous reversal of the long-term temperature trend of the last 3000 years resulting from Man-made CO2 emissions.
  • eventually this late 20th century temperature blip may come to be seen as just noise in the system in the longer term progress of comparatively rapid cooling over the past 3000+ years.
  • all published Greenland Ice Core records corroborate this finding. They exhibit the same pattern of a prolonged relatively stable early Holocene period followed by a subsequent much more rapid decline in the more recent (3000 year) past.
  • however, it would seem more likely than not that the Earth’s temperature will continue its downward course of the past 3000 years, unless it suddenly falls precipitously, as temperature has fallen rapidly terminating other interglacials.

However the much vaunted and much feared political “fatal” tipping point of +2°C would only bring Global temperatures back to the level of the very congenial climate of “the Roman warm period” 2000 years ago.  Were possible to reach the “horrendous” level of +4°C postulated by Alarmists, that extreme level of warming would still only bring temperatures to about the level of the previous Eemian maximum, a warm and abundant epoch, when hippopotami thrived in the Rhine delta.

For a more comprehensive views of the decline of the Holocene see:

Climate and Human Civilization over the last 18,000 years

As well as the out-gassing of CO2 from warmer oceans, atmospheric CO2 concentration has also seen a contribution due to the CO2 emissions from the use of fossil fuels by Man-kind over the past 200 years as the industrial revolution has advanced.  The records show that at present atmospheric CO2 is increasing from both these sources in combination is at about 2ppmv / year.  About half of any extra CO2 emissions are absorbed virtually immediately by the Oceans and the biosphere.

As life has thrived and as plants evolved with CO2 levels at about 10 times this level, any recent comparatively minor increase of atmospheric CO2 ought not to be of any real concern:

  • nonetheless, at its current low level, ~400ppmv, all Life on Earth is still entirely dependent on the CO2 in the atmosphere:  it is used by plants via photosynthesis to release oxygen and to thus generate all other organic compounds.
  • if atmospheric CO2 concentration falls below 150 ppmv, photosynthesis stops and plants and thus Life on Earth would be extinguished.
  • only ~30,000 years ago, in the depths of the last glaciation, all Life on Earth came close to that total annihilation, when atmospheric CO2 concentration fell to 180 ppmv, only ~15% above the terminal CO2 value of 150 ppmv:
    • this atmospheric CO2 reduction process is driven by colder Oceans absorbing more atmospheric CO2
    • in colder oceans atmospheric CO2 is progressively sequestered over millennia by marine life and eventually deposited as limestone.
    • so, as far as plant life is concerned even at ~400 ppmv the World is still in a state of CO2 starvation
    • from the point of view of plant life, at least 1200ppmv or more would be preferable:  this is well understood by horticulturalists
    • in the recent past, (the last 12,000 years,) as the present Holocene interglacial epoch has advanced, the Earth warmed, so warmer Oceans out-gassed CO2 to approach a pre-industrial level of ~300ppmv.
    • but when plants evolved on land, atmospheric CO2 levels were very much higher, (3000 – 4000 ppmv), ten fold current values and no runaway Global warming occurred.
    • there was very luxuriant plant growth in the Silurian and Devonian eras leading to the laying down of massive Coal deposits.
  • in the course of some future glaciation, natural processes with the cold Oceans absorbing atmospheric CO2 will finally extinguish all Life on Earth due to the starvation of Plant life for the of lack of sufficient of CO2 in the atmosphere.
  • thus, the interference of Man-kind, emitting extra CO2 into the atmosphere from the use of fossil fuels has the potential to slow these processes and thus probably extend the viability of all Life on Earth.
  • slow and deferred CO2 out-gassing process from warming Oceans is continuing and has been supplemented by Man-made CO2 emissions since the 1850s from the use of fossil fuels.
  • with these two CO2 sources in combination, CO2 level has now reached ~410ppmv
  • plant productivity improves radically with increasing atmospheric CO2 and NASA has already reported ~+15% more green growth worldwide.
  • globally over the last 50 years, enhanced agricultural productivity has enabled the growth in food supply for a growing World population.
  • plant productivity is hampered in colder weather:  any cooling can immediately lead to agricultural losses, as has already been seen in the last two growing seasons, 2020-2021, at the present Solar mnimum.
  • with cooling weather gets worse:  the temperature difference between the tropics and the poles increases and with that greater energy differential weather deteriorates.
  • the only way that atmospheric CO2 levels will ever reduce is by the cooling of the Oceans:  as they cool they will once again be able to re-absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, that can only occur in some coming major ~100,000 year glacial period.

The impact of future Man-made CO2 emissions

Climate Sensitivity is defined as the temperature effect of doubling atmospheric CO2 concentration.  This is the value assessed by Climate Modellers as their definitive result on which to base international policy.

A simplified estimate of the potency of CO2 as a Greenhouse gas is that its effectiveness diminishes logarithmically as concentration increases.  A simple, “back of the envelope calculation”, can thus show the likely temperature effect of doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration from the current 410ppmv up to a future 820ppmv.  The calculation takes no account of any possible feedbacks, which might enhance but which are likely to reduce the temperature effect of added CO2.

The assumptions behind the calculations and graphic below are as follows:

  • the Earth’s Greenhouse effect sustains Global temperature by about +33°C.
  • water vapour and clouds are responsible for approximately 90% of the total Greenhouse effect:  the net overall effect is correct but the actual effectiveness of water vapour and clouds is bound to be very variable according to latitude and local environmental conditions.
  • other than Water in the atmosphere CO2 is the next most effective greenhouse Gas.
  • CO2 and the other minor Greenhouse gases are responsible for roughly 10% of the total effect of about +~3.3°C.
  • logarithmic diminution operates for CO2 doubling concentration across the full range of CO2 concentration values:  the CO2 warming effect diminishes as its concentration increases.
  • so, in effect CO2 is a relatively insignificant “Greenhouse Gas”, and it is only in trace amounts at ~410 parts per million by volume, (ppmv).
  • the present ~410ppmv concentration of CO2 is an order of magnitude lower than the CO2 concentration levels existing when plants evolved some 500 million years ago.
  • if Plants had the vote they would much prefer higher CO2 levels and they would thrive even more.
Screenshot 2021-06-11 at 16.11.54.png

The diagram above shows how:

  • there is no direct, straight-line relationship between atmospheric CO2 concentration and its influence on temperature.
  • the “Greenhouse” warming effectiveness of CO2 diminishes logarithmically as its concentration increases, which implies:
    • CO2 at 20ppmv, ~42% of CO2 warming effectiveness is already taken up.
    • CO2 at 100ppmv, ~67% of CO2 warming effectiveness is taken up.
    • CO2 at 150ppmv, the CO2 level of plant and thus planetary viability, ~72% of CO2 warming effectiveness is taken up.
    • CO2 at 300ppmv, the long-term pre-industrial CO2 level, ~82% of CO2 warming effectiveness is taken up.
    • CO2 at the current level in the atmosphere at 410ppmv ~88% of the warming effectiveness of CO2 is already taken up.
  • the warming capability of CO2 is now so close to saturation because of the logarithmic diminution effect, that doubling concentration from 410ppmv to 820 ppmv results in a temperature effect of about +0.35°C, .
  • at the current rate CO2 of emissions growth, ~2.5ppmv/year, the transition to double the present CO2 concentration could take up to ~160 years.
  • thus, the minor temperature increase that might be attained from further Man-made CO2 emissions is both miniscule and far in the future.

Recent paper by. W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer. 2020

“Dependence of Earth’s Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse Gases”

Abstract: 

The atmospheric temperatures and concentrations of Earth’s five most important, greenhouse gases, H2O, CO2, O3, N2O and CH4 control the cloud-free, thermal radiative flux from the Earth to outer space. Over 1/3 million lines having strengths as low as 10−27 cm of the HITRAN database were used to evaluate the dependence of the forcing on the gas concentrations. For a hypothetical, optically thin atmosphere, where there is negligible saturation of the absorption bands, or interference of one type of greenhouse gas with others, the per-molecule forcings are of order 10−22 W for H2O, CO2, O3, N2O and CH4. For current atmospheric concentrations, the per-molecule forcings of the abundant greenhouse gases H2O and CO2 are suppressed by four orders of magnitude. The forcings of the less abundant greenhouse gases, O3, N2O and CH4, are also suppressed, but much less so. For current concentrations, the per-molecule forcings are two to three orders of magnitude greater for O3, N2O and CH4, than those of H2O or CO2. Doubling the current concentrations of CO2, N2O or CH4 increases the forcings by a few per cent. These forcing results are close to previously published values even though the calculations did not utilize either a CO2 or H2O continuum. The change in surface temperature due to CO2 doubling is estimated taking into account radiative-convective equilibrium of the atmosphere as well as water feedback for the cases of fixed absolute and relative humidities as well as the effect of using a pseudoadiabatic lapse rate to model the troposphere temperature. Satellite spectral measurements at various latitudes are in excellent quantitative agreement with modelled intensities.

This paper shows detailed results for all greenhouse Gases and their combined effect on the thermal radiation to space and thus their influence on Earth’s surface temperatures according to ~300,000 frequency bands.  It also assesses the the difference in radiation to space of differing concentrations of CO2 from 400 – 800 ppmv.

Further graphs can represent differing environments, at different latitudes with differing climates at differing cloudiness and humidity across the world:  nonetheless they all show the same fundamental picture.  Other natural feedbacks may on occasions change the parameters nonetheless the basic result remains.  At a maximum the value for Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity can not be greater than +0.75°C.

The graphic below summarises those results at temperate latitudes.  The effect of added CO2 up to 800ppmv is the difference in area between the red and black curves in other words just 3 Watts / square meter.  That amounts to a 1%  reduction to the radiation to space and confirms that as an overall estimate of logarithmic diminution of CO2 warming effectiveness is reasonable.

Screenshot 2021-06-19 at 09.11.40

As Will Happer said in a recent lecture

The important point here is the red line on this chart.  It shows what would happen if the concentration of CO2 was doubled.  The gap between the black line and the red line shows the extent of the effect of doubling CO2.  So, you can see that doubling CO2 now makes virtually no difference.

On the basis of this miniscule difference, we are supposed to give up our liberties, give up the gasoline engines in our automobiles, give up all the benefits of Western Industrial society and submit to dictatorial left-wing Government controls.

The message I want you to understand is:  don’t let anyone convince you that is a good bargain:  it is in fact a terrible bargain.” 

Conclusions

If the true limited future temperature effect of additional atmospheric CO2 is anywhere close to reality this result means that:

  • there is no immediate and catastrophic overheating problem arising from the further Man-made emissions of CO2 nor from the continued burning of fossil fuels.
  • at the current rates of growth of CO2 comcentrations it will take about 150 years for the effect of doubling CO2 to ~820 ppmv to materialise.
  • any Man-made increase in atmospheric CO2 can only beneficial for the Biosphere and for Man-kind.
  • more CO2 emitted to the atmosphere is likely to extend the viability of all life on Earth through future glacial periods.
  • the whole Global Warming / Climate Change agenda is a fabrication supported only by quasi-religious beliefs in the evils of Western industrial society and a political agenda intended to undermine Western capitalism.

As the undeveloped world advances, seeking the advantages of Western civilisations, atmospheric CO2 levels will continue to increase from their CO2 emissions with cheap coal-firing for electricity generation, for their greater general wellbeing and for their greater personal mobility.

Quantifying Futility: 2020 estimate of future CO2 emissions

Therefore whatever CO2 reductions and sacrifices of wellbeing are made in the Western World will be overtaken and soon exceeded by them.  It should be realised that climate change policies in the West are being enacted not on valid scientific evidence but on the basis of quasi religious emotions and active government propaganda.

So, all efforts in the West at CO2 reduction are futile, just inducing massive economic self-harm to Western Nations.

2 responses to “A global context for Man-made Climate Concerns”

  1. An important and often overlooked fact is that carbon dioxide supports the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere. CO2 fuels photosynthesis and oxygen is the result. This is true both in the atmosphere and ocean. Palaeo-oceanographic data show that higher atmospheric CO2 causes more oxygenation of the deepest ocean (“ventilation”) – and vice versa, CO2 paucity deoxygenates the water at the ocean floor. Everything about CO2 alarmism is as wrong as wrong can be.

    Like

  2. Agreed on all counts. Your knowledge of the long term evolution of the Earth is much better than mine.

    R your comment: 1. With cooling weather gets worse: the temperature difference between the tropics and the poles increases and with that greater energy differential weather deteriorates.
    2. The only way that atmospheric CO2 levels will ever reduce is by the cooling of the Oceans: as they cool they will once again be able to re-absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, that can only occur in some coming major ~100,000 year glacial period.

    The cooling is happening at the moment and with it flooding rains due to cooling in the mid latitudes. This cooling is the product of evolution in atmospheric phenomena since 2017.

    The anomaly in sea surface temperature in the mid latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere that tends to occur as albedo increases to its maximum in December is dictated by the evolution of ozone heating in the upper troposphere dictated by processes in the Arctic stratosphere between November and March. Basically, when the intake of mesospheric air that is hungry for ozone because NO wants to be NO4, is reduced the stratosphere warms. This is called a sudden stratospheric warming. The ozone fillip, responsible for the warming, is seen in all latitudes because, at jet stream levels and above, lateral transport is vigorous, much more so than at the surface.

    Since 2017 that anomalous peak has occurred later, shifting timewise from December where it was located after the climate shift of 1978 now tending to occur in March. The second last peak didn’t peak. It flatlined. The last peak wimped (most recent summer) out at half the usual intensity. La Nina is now returning with a vengeance. The rate of upwelling near the Galapagos increases as the pressure differential between the Chilean high and the Maritime Continent to the north of Australia increases in La Nina events and the centre of convection stays in the west. Now massive floods in India. Cyclone off the coast of China.

    The interesting thing is that the flux in upwelling that drives temperature in the tropics shows up in global temperature data as a monotonous coincidental beat . Upwelling occurs everywhere, at all latitudes and longitudes driven by wind stress and manifests as little warm spots where warm water has not been mixed in with cool water from below.

    Much depends upon the evolution of surface pressure. To understand that we need to understand what drives the evolution of the high latitude low pressure systems sometimes called Extratropical Lows.

    Does this make sense to you?

    History illuminates:
    When did climate science lose its way?

    Knowledge about the way the atmosphere is affected by the solar wind pre-dates the warming scare. Sometimes we disregard good work done in the past. In fact we select our references to support the narrative that we favour. Its called standing on the shoulders of giants. The editors of peer reviewed journals chart a course to suit their preferences like Lord Nelson when he placed his telescope up to his blind eye. This is the result of the penetration of the environmental movement into all aspects of Western Society and the fierce determination of the people involved to get their way. You would not expect to see the phenomena that I describe her laid out in an IPCC report. The IPCC is a United Nations organization with a political purpose, often laudable but sometimes not, as we have seen with WHO in relation to Covid.

    The lead author for the first three UNIPCC reports was a mathematician who took up the first professorship in climate science at Oxford, taking over from a humble lecturer and instrument maker, but nevertheless a giant in his understanding of the workings of the atmosphere, Gordon Dobson, now forgotten. Sir John Houghton was deeply religious but not strong on observation and measurement which was Dobson’s forte. Houghton decreed that the investigation of relationship between geomagnetic activity and the movement of the atmosphere would cease. Dobson went back to his garden shed and built the instrument that measures the ozone concentration of the atmosphere. A map of total column ozone is also a map of surface pressure. That puts the stratosphere in the driving seat in determining atmospheric phenomena. Houghton, like a medieval Pope, insisted that Dobson recant his heresy.

    ‘Sir’ John Houghton was not only rewarded with a knighthood. He shared a Nobel prize with Al Gore.

    Like

Leave a comment